Graduate Technical Writing Workshop

By MIT OpenCourseWare · Published by MIT Open Learning · Language: English
Source: MIT Open Learning Format: Course materials Undergraduate / College
Literature Humanities MIT OpenCourseWare MIT OpenCourseWare

"Graduate Technical Writing Workshop" is a Course materials drawn from MIT Open Learning and catalogued under Engineering for Undergraduate / College. From the source: This course is designed to improve the student’s ability to communicate technical information. It covers the basics of working with sources, including summarizing and paraphrasing, synthesizing source materials, citing, quoting, and avoiding plagiarism. It also… Slide Collection preserves the upstream link, the original creator credit and the licensing terms; download the file to use it in a classroom, study group or revision plan.

About this presentation

This course is designed to improve the student’s ability to communicate technical information. It covers the basics of working with sources, including summarizing and paraphrasing, synthesizing source materials, citing, quoting, and avoiding plagiarism. It also covers how to write an abstract and a literature review. In addition, we will cover communication concepts, tools, and strategies that can help you understand how engineering texts work, and how you can make your texts work more effectively. This course is limited to MIT graduate engineering students based on results of the Graduate Writing Exam.

How to study this deck

Engineering presentations frame trade-offs more than absolutes. As you study, list the constraints the slide is implicitly optimizing for (cost, weight, safety factor, manufacturability) — that list is the real lesson.

Undergraduate viewers should treat this as a scaffolding for deeper reading — the slides outline the territory, but the textbook chapters and primary sources remain the actual content.

Five questions to test your understanding

  1. What is the single most important claim on the first three slides, and what evidence is offered for it?
  2. Which slide could you remove without losing the argument? Which slide is load-bearing?
  3. Where does the deck switch from definitions to applications? Mark that transition.
  4. What would a student who already disagreed with the conclusion need to see to be convinced?
  5. Which two slides, if combined, would give the clearest one-slide summary of the whole deck?

Where this deck fits in the wider catalogue

Slide Collection classifies this presentation under Engineering, alongside other openly-licensed material in the same subject. If you are preparing a unit at the Undergraduate / College level, the dedicated combined Engineering · Undergraduate / College page is the fastest way to find adjacent decks with the same audience in mind.

Citation & reuse

If you reuse material from this deck in your own teaching or coursework, please cite the original source on the Internet Archive and check the license attached to the file before redistribution. Slide Collection links to the upstream source on every detail page so the original creator and licensing terms are always one click away.

Source: View original on MIT Open Learning →